Away from the spotlight, a new world order is emerging in the bond market: Investors are betting on the long-term growth prospects of Japan over China for the first time in decades.

As trade policy changes have drawn much attention to US Treasury yields, Japan’s 30-year government bond yield has risen 50 basis points (bps) this year to 2.77% in early May—87 bps higher than the yield on the same-duration Chinese bond. This marks a major turnabout; China’s 30-year government bond yield has historically traded higher than its Japanese peer.

Changing of the Guard: China vs. Japan 30-Year Bond Yields

The Changing Composition of European Stock Markets

As of 31 March 2025
Source: Bloomberg

Long-term bond yields typically indicate investors’ expectations for future economic growth and inflation. The switch signals hope that Japan’s economy may return to more sustainable economic success while indicating caution about China’s economic trajectory. 

How could the long-term economic outlook appear brighter for a highly developed country with a population of 125 million than for the world’s largest emerging economy with 1.4 billion people? Near-term growth in China will likely face challenges due to ongoing trade tensions with the United States, but the long-term outlook is shaped by underlying economic fundamentals. Viewed through this lens, Japan’s comparatively favorable outlook becomes more understandable.

Pillars of Success

Successful economies share several fundamental characteristics. First, as Nobel laureates Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson have demonstrated, these economies have strong institutions that facilitate broad economic participation. Second, as their research also uncovered, these countries ensure stability through the rule of law.1  Finally, as extensive economic research has underscored, successful economies are fundamentally market-based. The absence of any of these three critical elements can impede economic momentum. 

Japan has these pillars and had become a breakthrough economic success during the second half of the 20th century. It achieved developed economy status by the 1960s and continued to advance into the 1980s.

Eventually, debt dynamics, demographics, and the 1985 Plaza Accord that revalued the yen led to the burst of Japan’s famous asset price bubble and a historic balance sheet recession. Japan’s average annual growth rate has amounted to only 0.77% over the last 30 years, while inflation was on average only 0.42% a year. 

Over the same three decades, China’s economy expanded at an annual average rate of 8.48%, while inflation amounted to 3.67% annually. When Japan’s economic growth stalled, China took up the baton; the market reforms that had been initiated by Premier Deng Xiaoping unleashed one of the greatest periods of wealth generation the world has ever seen. 

The bond market reflected the growth differential. Japanese 30-year government bonds yielded on average 0.98% annually from 2016–2024, while their Chinese counterparts yielded an average 3.34%.  

Reversal of Fortune

Now the tables have turned.

Japan has cleaned up bank balance sheets and overhauled corporate governance rules. Its monetary policy remained loose throughout the post-COVID-19 inflationary shock, and currency weakness imported further inflation, ultimately driving wages higher. Today, the economy is normalizing: Inflation is around 3.6%, and growth is picking up. With the three pillars of long-term success in place, the outlook for Japan has brightened. 

In contrast, China’s growth engine sputtered after the financial crisis in 2008, although fiscal stimulus pumped through its economy for another decade. The pandemic dealt a severe blow to the economy, leading to numerous city shutdowns. To keep growth on its planned path, China had to take on significantly more debt on an aggregate level. Across all sectors, the total debt-to-GDP ratio has soared to 289%, a record high for the country and significantly greater than all other emerging markets at 126%.2  This debt profile is not expected to improve soon: Fitch Ratings downgraded China’s credit in early April in part because the country is likely to employ sustained fiscal stimulus to support growth amid low demand, deflationary pressures, and higher US tariffs.3  China’s demographic picture is also changing as its working-age population begins to contract, and this is projected to accelerate in the coming years.  

Where Is China Heading? 

Some investors draw parallels between Japan’s economy 30 years ago and China’s current situation. However, while successful economies share common traits, each struggling economy faces unique challenges.  

China’s first obstacle to achieving sustained economic success is that it has only one of the three essential pillars. From a bottom-up perspective, China’s economy is market-based, which has driven remarkable growth over the past three decades. However, the other two pillars—robust institutions and the rule of law—are less firmly established. The absence of these critical supports has contributed to China’s current predicament. A significant misallocation of capital in the housing sector led to a bubble that has since burst and will likely take years to resolve. Additionally, government efforts to curb private profit and wealth from 2020 to 2023 stifled China’s entrepreneurial spirit in the process. 

China’s economy now faces the risk that growth momentum may not be enough to escape the middle income trap.4  Smaller countries such as South Korea and Singapore successfully transformed from low-skilled manufacturing to high-income economies. In contrast, China’s vast size and heavy reliance on exports mean it would need to drive significant portions of the global economy through the middle-income trap alongside it to fully consolidate its wealth gains. 

This challenge is exceptionally difficult, and the bond market remains cautious. China’s 30-year yield of 1.89% points to stagnation at best. The emerging economy will need to find a new equilibrium, but the question is whether the adjustment will be a swift one followed by sustainable growth, or a prolonged political and economic crisis. The latter scenario would be detrimental not only for China but the world at large.  

Several developments over the first quarter have been encouraging. President Xi Jinping has reversed course on the private sector’s progress, explicitly encouraging technology business leaders to innovate. The government has also pledged to support the country’s major banks and officially prioritized efforts to boost consumer demand. In our view, however, deeper structural reforms are needed to set the economy on a path to long-term success—and the sooner these are implemented, the better. 

What Does It Mean for Investors?

Japan and China, two influential economic powerhouses, are navigating critical turning points in their development. The movement in their long-term bond yields provides a window into the economic landscape and highlights broader themes of transformation and growth. For investors, understanding these dynamics and interpreting the economic narratives can uncover potential opportunities that arise during these economic shifts.  

1. Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson received the 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics for their work on what makes countries prosper. For a summary of their research and links to it, see The Prize in Economic Sciences 2024 - Popular science background - NobelPrize.org
2. International Monetary Fund, 2024 Global Debt Monitor.pdf
3. 3 April 2025. Fitch Downgrades China to 'A'; Outlook Stable
4. “Middle income trap,” a term coined by World Bank economists Indermit Gill and Homi Kharas in 2007, describes economies that are struggling to transition from growth strategies that are effective at low-income levels to strategies that are effective at high-income levels (currently defined by the World Bank as income per capita greater than $14,005). For recent thinking on causes and solutions, see World Development Report 2024: The Middle Income Trap.

 

Important Information
Published on 7 May 2025

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed by Lazard to be reliable. Lazard makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. All opinions expressed herein are as of the published date and are subject to change.

The performance quoted represents past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

Mention of these securities should not be considered a recommendation or solicitation to purchase or sell the securities. It should not be assumed that any investment in these securities was, or will prove to be, profitable or that the investment decisions we make in the future will be profitable or equal to the investment performance of securities referenced herein. There is no assurance that any securities referenced herein are currently held in the portfolio or that securities sold have not been repurchased. The securities mentioned may not represent the entire portfolio.

Allocations and security selection are subject to change.

An investment in bonds carries risk. If interest rates rise, bond prices usually decline. The longer a bond’s maturity, the greater the impact a change in interest rates can have on its price. If you do not hold a bond until maturity, you may experience a gain or loss when you sell. Bonds also carry the risk of default, which is the risk that the issuer is unable to make further income and principal payments. Other risks, including inflation risk, call risk, and pre-payment risk, also apply. High yield securities (also referred to as “junk bonds”) inherently have a higher degree of market risk, default risk, and credit risk. Securities in certain non-domestic countries may be less liquid, more volatile, and less subject to governmental supervision than in one’s home market. The values of these securities may be affected by changes in currency rates, application of a country’s specific tax laws, changes in government administration, and economic and monetary policy. Emerging markets securities carry special risks such as less developed or less efficient trading markets, a lack of company information, and differing auditing and legal standards. The securities markets of emerging markets countries can be extremely volatile; performance can also be influenced by political, social, and economic factors affecting companies in these countries. Derivatives transactions, including those entered into for hedging purposes, may reduce returns or increase volatility, perhaps substantially. Forward currency contracts and other derivatives investments are subject to the risk of default by the counterparty, can be illiquid, and are subject to many of the risks of, and can be highly sensitive to changes in the value of, the related currency or other reference asset. As such, a small investment could have a potentially large impact on performance. Use of derivatives transactions, even if entered into for hedging purposes, may cause losses greater than if an account had not engaged in such transactions.

Certain information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “target,” “intent,” “continue,” or “believe,” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.

This document is provided by Lazard for informational purposes only. Nothing herein constitutes investment advice or a recommendation relating to any security, commodity, derivative, investment management service, or investment product. Investments in securities, derivatives, and commodities involve risk, will fluctuate in price, and may result in losses. Certain assets held in Lazard’s investment portfolios, in particular alternative investment portfolios, can involve high degrees of risk and volatility when compared to other assets. Similarly, certain assets held in Lazard’s investment portfolios may trade in less liquid or efficient markets, which can affect investment performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The views expressed herein are subject to change and may differ from the views of other Lazard investment professionals.

This document is intended only for persons residing in jurisdictions where its distribution or availability is consistent with local laws and Lazard’s local regulatory authorizations. Please visit https://www.lazardassetmanagement.com/global-disclosure for the specific Lazard entities that have issued this document and the scope of their authorized activities.