Summary

Our research suggests that investors do not have to choose between their return objectives and their values if they focus on “compounders,” or companies that demonstrate the highest level of financial productivity. Many of these companies have strong ESG characteristics and it appears these companies have the potential to deliver superior investment returns over the long term.

In addition to being positively correlated with equity returns, the teams also find a strong relationship between financial productivity and environmental and governance ratings. To demonstrate the link between financial productivity and carbon intensity, the teams grouped the active members of the MSCI AC World Index into deciles of reported financial productivity and then compared this with the average carbon footprint for each financial productivity decile, between 2015 and 2018 (Exhibit 1).

The most financially productive companies (i.e., those that fall within the top decile of financial productivity) have the lowest carbon footprint. The teams also found a similar relationship between firms’ financial productivity and their MSCI governance ranking, as the most financially productive companies typically also have the strongest corporate governance practices (Exhibit 2).

EXHIBIT 1

Financial Productivity and Carbon Intensity Are Closely Linked

As at 25 May 2018
Carbon emissions data as at 31 January 2018. The active members of the MSCI AC World Index have been grouped into deciles of reported financial productivity and then compared with the average carbon footprint for each financial productivity decile between 2015 and 2018.
Source: Lazard, Credit Suisse, Trucost

EXHIBIT 2

Strong Governance May Enhance Financial Performance

As at 25 May 2018
Governance scores as at 31 January 2018. The active members of the MSCI AC World Index have been grouped into deciles of reported financial productivity and then compared with the average MSCI governance score for each financial productivity decile between 2015 and 2018.
Source: Lazard, Credit Suisse, MSCI

Important information
Published on 25 June 2018.

Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed by Lazard to be reliable. Lazard makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. All opinions expressed herein are as of the published date and are subject to change.

This content represents the views of the author(s), and its conclusions may vary from those held elsewhere within Lazard Asset Management. Lazard is committed to giving our investment professionals the autonomy to develop their own investment views, which are informed by a robust exchange of ideas throughout the firm. Information and opinions presented have been obtained or derived from sources believed by Lazard to be reliable. Lazard makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change.

Lazard Asset Management (“Lazard” or the “firm”) actively manages client portfolios with the objective of delivering positive investment performance and maximizing long-term shareholder value. Portfolio managers at Lazard have discretion to incorporate ESG considerations into their investment processes, and to what degree. Information concerning a particular investment strategy’s utilization of ESG considerations (including its status as ESG Integrated or Sustainability Focused under our procedures) are set forth in Lazard’s description of that strategy, or are available upon request.

Other disclosures herein may describe sustainable investment views and resources that Lazard’s ESG professionals have developed to assist our clients and portfolio management teams. However, unless expressly disclosed, readers should not assume that these views and resources are incorporated in a portfolio management team’s investment process.