Executive Summary | Three Core Convictions | United States | China | Eurozone | Japan | Investment Implications
As of April 2026
Source: Centaline, Morgan Stanley
As of April 2026
Source: Chinese National Bureau of Statistics, Haver Analytics
China’s K-Shaped Economy and the Need for Structural Reforms
China continues to report real GDP of ~5% per annum, as “new economy” sectors such as electric vehicles and energy transition products grow rapidly and gain market share globally. But the quality of China’s economic growth has deteriorated as domestic drivers weaken and the country becomes more dependent on exports.
In recent months, industrial production has grown by 4%–6% year-over-year while retail sales fell year-over-year in May for the first time since the COVID pandemic, as manufacturers produced more goods than domestic consumers could buy. Rather than pursuing the structural reforms needed to strengthen consumption, however, the government appears to be doubling down on central planning and industrial policy—a model built on suppressed domestic wages, elevated savings rates, and export dependence that looks increasingly unsustainable.
In my view, the top priority should be addressing structural inequality. This would mean significantly improving the social safety net for rural workers, who typically earn the lowest wages and receive minimal government benefits in retirement. Approximately 180 million Chinese citizens receive an average benefit of RMB246 per month, which equates to $34 per month.3 By contrast, about 120 million urban retirees receive a much more generous benefit of RMB3,498 ($485) per month, while the roughly 20 million government retirees receive RMB6,243 ($867) per month. While some differentiation in retirement payments is warranted due to the cost of living in cities versus rural areas, this level of rural deprivation is extreme and could easily be alleviated without significant adverse consequences.
Encouragingly, some National People’s Congress members called for higher farmers’ pension payments in the 2026 Two Sessions. If the Chinese government were to enact such reforms, I believe the growth outlook for China would be brighter over a considerably longer time horizon than it is today, as consumer spending would increase while fears of outliving savings would decrease.
China’s Export Engine
In the absence of the historical tailwinds from infrastructure and real estate construction, China’s export engine has become increasingly important to driving growth. In 2025, ~33% of China’s real GDP growth was driven by net exports—the highest level since 1997— and the trade surplus reached $1.18 trillion or ~6% of GDP (Exhibit 9). Despite the US-initiated trade war in 2025, China’s exports rose to a new record of over $370 billion in May 2026, a 19% increase from the comparable periods in 2025. Not all of the increase, however, has been due to market share gains. China has also been a beneficiary of the AI-related capex boom with demand for legacy semiconductors and other technology equipment rising sharply, leading to price increases versus historical price erosion.
As of December 2025
Source: China Customs General Administration, Haver Analytics
Eurozone
Europe’s anticipated 2026 recovery was derailed by the Iran war but I believe increased defense spending brightens the region’s long-term growth prospects.
Japan
Japan’s corporate reform agenda continues to bear fruit, while rising rates could contribute to the strengthening of the yen against the US dollar and other currencies.
Investment Implications
As allocators recalibrate, I anticipate a rotation away from US equities, growing demand for EM debt, and heightened interest in real assets.
Three Core Convictions
A weakening US dollar will cause investors to rethink their US exposure; steeper yield curves will follow widening fiscal deficits; non-US equities will gain traction.
United States
While AI-driven tailwinds continue to lift US equity market performance, underlying economic resiliency seems increasingly dubious.
Important Information
Notes
2. This analysis relies on Centaline’s home price data, published by Centaline Property Agency Limited. Even though Centaline only capture homes listed on its platform in six major Chinese cities, it better captures price volatility as housing sentiment shifts than the National Bureau of Statistics data, which tends to understate price volatility and largely excludes discounting from reported prices.
3. Data as of 2024.
Published on 24 June 2026.
The performance quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
This material is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to, and does not constitute financial advice, fund management services, or an offer of financial products or to enter into any contract or investment agreement in respect of any product offered by Lazard Asset Management and shall not be considered as an offer or solicitation with respect to any product, security, or service in any jurisdiction or in any circumstances in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful or unauthorized or otherwise restricted or prohibited.
Certain information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking statements” which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “target,” “intent,” “continue,” or “believe,” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.
This content represents the views of the author(s), and its conclusions may vary from those held elsewhere within Lazard.
These materials have been prepared by Lazard for general informational purposes only on a non-reliance basis and they are not intended to be, and should not be construed as, financial, legal, or other advice.
In preparing these materials, Lazard has assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of any publicly available information and of any other information made available to Lazard by any third parties, and Lazard has not assumed any responsibility for any independent verification of any of such information. These materials are based upon economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information available to Lazard as of, the date hereof, unless indicated otherwise. Subsequent developments may affect the information set out in this document and Lazard assumes no responsibility for updating or revising these materials.
These materials may include certain statements regarding future conditions and events. These statements and the conditions and events they describe are inherently subject to uncertainty, and there can be no assurance that any of the future conditions or events described in these materials will be realized. In fact, actual future conditions and events may differ materially from what is described in these materials. Lazard assumes no responsibility for the realization (or lack of realization) of any future conditions or events described in these materials.
No liability whatsoever is accepted and no representation, warranty or undertaking, express or implied, is or will be made by Lazard or any of its affiliates for any information contained herein or for any errors, omissions, or misstatements herein. Neither Lazard nor any of its affiliates makes or has authorized to be made any representations or warranties (express or implied) in relation to the matters contained herein or as to the truth, accuracy, or completeness of this document.
Nothing herein shall constitute a commitment or undertaking on the part of Lazard to provide any service. Lazard shall have no duties or obligations to you in respect of these materials or other advice provided to you, except to the extent specifically set forth in an engagement or other written agreement, if any, that is entered into by Lazard and you.
By accepting this document, each recipient agrees to be expressly bound by the foregoing limitations.